RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft

"John Colby" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.html.general,gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general
Message-ID <107DE25EC0216C45AEF670016024245F01642F5A@exchangea.staff.uce.ac.uk>
Despite all the semantics it really does make a difference to this
argument that IE does not recognise and treat correctly <abbr> but does
recognise and treat correctly <acronym>. The mouseover will display a
tooltip. It also makes a difference that <acronym> has been dropped from
the proposals for XHTML 2.0. Other browsers treat each correctly.

So the pragmatic approach would be to use <acronym> for both acronyms
and abbreviations for all documents, although it is not semantically
correct, and then when it is practicable to change the !DOCTYPE
declaration for XHTML 2.0 do a global search and replace for <acronym>
to <abbr>.

John

John Colby
Lecturer, School of Computing, Faculty of Computing, Information and
English
Room F328a, Feeney Building, University of Central England,
Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU
Tel: +44 (0) 121 331 6937, Fax +44 (0) 121 331 6281, Mobile: 0771 114
1621
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.