Re: w3.org site-wide markup review?
Jonathan Chetwynd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.site-comments,gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ian what is the hold on an independent external audit? an audit to assess whether and to what extent W3C is meeting the goals it sets? this was apparently under-discussion at the time. regards Jonathan >> ). But >> given the W3C's key role in producing the relevant specs and >> guidelines, there's a good case for saying its own pages should be >> subject to far higher standards of quality control than any other on >> the Web. Best practices, leading by example and all that. >> >> A good way for dealing with this would be for the W3C to instigate an >> independent review, > > Hi Danny, > > I appreciate any offer of tools to help us maintain pages that > people use, and where the tool ends up lowering our costs. > > This list is one way people raise awareness about page problems, and > I read the list and fix the ones that we are maintaining and can be > fixed. > > _ Ian > >