FW:XHTML validator - possible bug

To whom it may concern,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; My name is Roman Ali and I am a second-year undergraduat=
e<BR>computer science student at the University of Manchester.&nbsp; I am a=
<BR>technology enthusiast, and therefore happened to be browsing your<BR>we=
bsite for no particular reason other than to learn a bit more about<BR>Web =
development.&nbsp; Anyway, recently I had clicked on one of your =93valid<B=
R>XHTML=94 links (found at the bottom of most of your Web pages) and found<=
BR>that some of these pages did not actually validate.&nbsp; This seemed<BR=
>somewhat ironic, and amusing, for a person such as myself, considering<BR>=
the fact that the World Wide Web Consortium is considered to be the<BR>worl=
d authority of Web development.&nbsp; I let you know of this via email.<BR>=
Today I clicked on one of these pages again and was pleased to see that<BR>=
it did validate.&nbsp; However, the results page (which says the referring<=
BR>page has validated) also had a link to validate it (i.e. to validate the=
<BR>result=92s page).&nbsp; The result=92s page arising from that also had =
a link in<BR>the same fashion.&nbsp; This trend continued for all the resul=
ts pages I<BR>received.&nbsp; It occurred to me that this could negatively =
affect your<BR>systems IF you have not anticipated this in advance, and hav=
e not<BR>pre-emptively put in measures to deal with such a situation.&nbsp;=
 You<BR>probably have put in any necessary measures to deal with such a<BR>=
situation, but I felt obliged to express my opinions just in case you<BR>ha=
dn=92t<A href=3D"http://www.terra.es/personal7/a100006/">.</A>&nbsp; I am s=
ure you have understood what I have said, but in case I<BR>have not been cl=
ear enough, I shall give an example below.<BR><BR>If I click on the =93vali=
d XHTML 1.0=94 link at the bottom of the page<BR>located at: HYPERLINK<BR>I=
 receive the following results page: HYPERLINK<BR>http<BR>://validator.w3.o=
rg/check?uri=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%2F<BR>If I then click on the =
=93valid XHTML 1<A href=3D"http://www.terra.es/personal7/a100006/mature-wom=
en/">.</A>0=94 link at the bottom of the<BR>results page I have just receiv=
ed, I receive another results page:<BR>If I then click on the =93valid XHTM=
L 1.0=94 link at the bottom of this new<BR>results page I have just receive=
d, I receive another results page:<BR>HYPERLINK<BR>&nbsp;<BR>In my opinion,=
 if some malicious person, or someone who isn=92t malicious<BR>but ignorant=
, keeps continuing to click on the =93valid XHTML 1<A href=3D"http://www.te=
rra.es/personal7/a100006/anal-sex-and-older-women/">.</A>0=94 links<BR>foun=
d on the results pages of validations he/she has carried out in an<BR>itera=
tive manner, the long addresses generated by such validations could<BR>poss=
ibly negatively affect your systems and/or their browser.&nbsp; This is<BR>=
not a professional opinion as I am a student at the moment with limited<BR>=
knowledge.&nbsp; I would appreciate it very much if you would kindly let me=
<BR>know whether the opinion I have expressed is true or not.&nbsp; I ask f=
or<BR>this just so that I may increase my knowledge even further<A href=3D"=
http://www.terra.es/personal7/a100006/house-wives-older-women-porn-sex-tgp-=
pussy-tits-sex/">.</A>&nbsp; <U>Thank you.</U><BR>Yours faithfully<BR>&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Roman Ali.<BR=
><BR>---<BR>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.<BR>Checked by AVG anti-v=
irus system <BR>Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 28/0=
9/2004<A href=3D"http://www.terra.es/personal7/a100006/women-50-or-older-wh=
o-want-sex-now/">.</A><BR><BR>-- <BR><BR>
--=20
<p>___________________________________________________________<br>Sign-up f=
or Ads Free at Mail.com<br>
<a href=3D"http://mail01.mail.com/scripts/payment/adtracking.cgi?bannercode=
=3Dadsfreejump01" target=3D"_blank">http://www.mail.com/?sr=3Dsignup</a></p>