Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion

Avi Arditti <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.guidelines
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks Emmanuelle (I didn't know about the Inclusion Europe and Guide de la
redaction sites!) and thanks Doyle (linking to a translation page makes sense
especially if the source language is written plainly or in a controlled
language.)

Avi

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo wrote:

> Hi Avi,
>
> Well, next some references,
> - Make it Simple: European Guidelines for the Production of Easy-to-Read
> Information
> (in all the european languages, but I don't believe that they are applicable
> to all the document types, they are centered especially in people with
> cognitive deficiencies. In Sidar we are working to define what guidelines,
> of the version in Spanish, they would be applicable to all the documents.)
> http://www.inclusion-europe.org/information/eetr.htm
> http://www.inclusion-europe.org/documents/SAD64EETREN.pdf
>
> - Guide de la redaction (Ministère de la fonction publique et de la réforme
> de l'Etat:
> http://www.fonction-publique.gouv.fr/reforme/simplification/cosla/guide.htm
>
> - Fight the fog:
> http://europa.eu.int/comm/translation/en/ftfog/index.htm
> (A very instructive and funny place, of the Service of Translation of the
> European Commission.)
>
> - Plain Language Commission
> http://www.clearest.co.uk/cesacccrit.htm
>
> I hope this helps you in their titanic task :-)
>
> Best Regards,
> Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
> Coordinadora del SIDAR
> mailto: [email protected]
> http://www.sidar.org
>

Doyle wrote:

> My two cents worth is - if you print a list of any sort, and most especially
> a long list, readers will possibly take that as an all inclusive list.  If
> readers do so (consider the list to be all inclusive), we'll be getting all
> sorts of feedback along the lines of, "but, you forgot blah, blah, blah".
>
> It seems logical to assume that authors of materials in different languages
> only need to be asked to write clearly in their particular language, use
> common rules of grammar for their language and have web pages that follow
> the language of the particular web content (if it's scientific, write with
> that readership in mind and where possible write to a wider span of
> readers).
>
> Maybe a couple of examples but the issue there is in what languages will you
> promote this checkpoint?  If you go to the government web site for HUD
> (http://www.hud.gov/cgi-bin/intercept?http://babel.altavista.com/translate.d
> yn?lin=en&url=http://www.neighborhoodnetworks.org) this page will redirect
> you to a translation page...but, the initial connection with this page is in
> English and no other language.  Some might be able to muddle through it,
> even if they did not read English but accurate ideas about the links would
> be diminished if you were a non-English reader.  But, maybe the HUD idea is
> better than no access at all...I dunno!
>
> Doyle
>
> --
> Doyle Burnett
> Education Specialist
> Multiple Disabilities Program
> 907-562-7372
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.