Re: 5.4: proposal re level 2 success criteria

The wording below is so vague as to support Jason's first argument that the
succcess criterion be removed. In fact, I suggest that while it is fine
advice, it is not clear to me why any 3 people would do the same thing in
arriving at a decision, let alone the 8 or 9 out of 10 that is our test for
"testability"

Chaals

On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Jason White wrote:

>If checkpoint 5.4 is retained, I suggest that the level 2 success
>criteria be rewritten to correspond to the review requirements
>elsewhere in the guidelines, viz.:
>The content has been reviewed and is believed to be compatible with a
>range of assistive technologies.