RE: AUWG Teleconference on 29 July 2013 1:00pm-2:00pm ET

"Richards, Jan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.tools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
http://www.w3.org/2013/07/29-au-minutes.html

Full text:
WAI AU

29 Jul 2013

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jeanne, Tom, Alastair, Jutta, Cherie
Regrets
Tim_B., Alex_L.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan
Contents

Topics
CR process update (Jeanne and Jan)
1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)
3. Implementation report update (Jan)
Summary of Action Items
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
CR process update (Jeanne and Jan)

JS: reviewing exit criteria...
... Any questions, thoughts, concerns?
JT: We should clarify that what we are proposing is that we are passing them by W3M...
... So they can register and objections.
JS: My only concern is the 2nd sentence in para 3...
... It can be hard to explain the ATAG-WCAG relationship...3 levels each...but is unrealisitic to expect tools to meet every WCAG AAA SC
... We chose the number two because it is common in W3C requirements
JT: Any concerns about this proposed wording?
... And are people ok sending it to w3m
JR: +1
AC: IF my looking at an individual tool....
JS: Are we will try to choose diverse examples
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html
<AlastairC> There don't seem to be any Non-text media examples in the top row of the implementing tools?
JS: We have a couple of ideas
TB: I checked on Worklight and it won't work for us
<AlastairC> Would xcode qualify for this? Code-level editor, but I think is accessible?
TB: We are making progress on the other one
<AlastairC> I have it installed, I'll check it out. I can ask on a VoiceOver list as well.
JT: So we should repeat to Cherie....
Zaki, Jan has Jutta
JT: Can people indicate when they have read the document...
... then hopefully we can come to resolution on what to do.
EC: I've scanned through it
JT: Are people ok with this draft as it is?
<AlastairC> The exit criterial? Yep, it's good.
JT: Are people ok with this draft exit criteria as it is?
<AlastairC> \me sorry, don't trust my audio, I'll type.
JT: Does anyone object to the exit crieria?
... None heard
... Can we send to W3M?
JS: +1
<AlastairC> +1
JS: Also it is pretty informal
JR: +1 to send it along
JT: OK I think there is concensus to take that step and send it to W3M
1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)

<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html
JS: Some feedback received from W3M...
... Did show enough diversity of devices...
... Had to change the milestones from saying CR in May to CR in Septemebr
<AlastairC> Yep, I assume that a year is a reasonable time for comments and changes from CR?
TB: Looks good to me
... but how does it compare to other guidelines?
<AlastairC> no objection
JT: OK so are people fine with these changes to the charter (added mention of various devices and then changes to dates)?
<jeanne> +1 to the charter
JT: Objections?
... non eheard
Resolution: Go ahead with changes to the charter (added mention of various devices and then changes to dates)
3. Implementation report update (Jan)

JR: Medium sized tools make excellent examples
JS: Right, but enterprise tools are very valuable so please keep pushing for that
... I don't want to overlook enterprise wide tools
CE: OK, but the point has been made that enterprise tools out now won't be fully meeting ATAG
JT: Yes, we want variety
<AlastairC> an accessibility orgnanisation I'm involved with is using an enterprise level CRM, I offered to check it over for them in the fall (when they have it implementated)
JT: Great!
... That's the agenda
... There will be a meeting next week
<AlastairC> thanks all, bye
JR: I will send out announcement but may not be there due to CDN holiday







(MR) JAN RICHARDS
PROJECT MANAGER
INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
OCAD UNIVERSITY

T 416 977 6000 x3957
F 416 977 9844
E [email protected]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richards, Jan
> Sent: July-26-13 3:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: AUWG Teleconference on 29 July 2013 1:00pm-2:00pm ET
> 
> There will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 29 July 2013 at 1:00 pm-
> 2:00 pm ET:
> Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
> Zakim: +1.617.761.6200       (Boston)
> IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au
> 
> If people think they will arrive more than 15 minutes late, please send me an
> email beforehand.
> 
> Most Recent Editors Drafts
> =====================
> ATAG 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-ATAG20-20130627/
> 
> Implementing ATAG 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20130627/
> 
> Test Resources:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2-10April2012PublicWD-Tests
> 
> Implementation Report:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html
> 
> 
> Agenda
> ======
> 
> 1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne) - we have an extension until September so
> we need to move quickly on CR
> - but comments starting come back that need attention
> 
> 2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan)
> - Jeanne will send Exit Criteria to the group when she can. The purpose of
> this meeting is to approve sending these on to W3M for comments.
> 
> 3. Implementation report update (Jan)
> - a number of other tools have been added (see top table)
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html
> 
> - Please send in your additions/edits in the following format:
>  SC#-Level-Product-Status
> E.g. A.1.1.1-LevelA-Drupal-Yes
> 
> 4. Other issues?
> 
> (MR) JAN RICHARDS
> PROJECT MANAGER
> INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
> OCAD UNIVERSITY
> 
> T 416 977 6000 x3957
> F 416 977 9844
> E [email protected]
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.