RE: AUWG Teleconference for 30 September

"Richards, Jan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.tools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2013/09/30-au-minutes.html

Full text:
WAI AU

30 Sep 2013

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Alex, L.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan
Contents

Topics
1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)
2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan) - we are in Last Call until October 1.
3. Implementation report update (Jan)
4. Other issues?
Summary of Action Items
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)

JS: No news for this week

JR: Doesn't it end today?

JS: Yes...big implication is we can't publish
... I'm just unsure...I didn't talk to Judy about it
... I will send an email to the group

JT: But we can continue with the meetings, etc?

2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan) - we are in Last Call until October 1.

JS: Still just the one comment

<Greg> What was the comment about?
JS: Comments close end of day... midnight Eastern on Tues.

<Greg> +1
<jeanne> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-atag2-comments/2013Sep/0001.html
JS: This is the comment

JR: Proposed response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JulSep/0071.html

<Greg> NO
> Capturing the results of accessibility evaluation performed by authors has
> several advantages, including:
> * enabling the re-use of self-evaluation results to substantiate WCAG 2.0
> conformance claims;
> * enabling auditing as a credible alternative to product inspections;
> * enabling aggregation of evaluation results (for research purposes,
> monitoring and ranking);
> * enhancement of the scope of large-scale monitoring of web accessibility,
> which at present often is limited to a subset of WCAG 2.0 (i.e. what can be
> reliably programmatically determined);
> * supporting the transition of web content accessibility management from
> a product-based approach to a process-based approach. This will especially
> help integrating the subject of web accessibility into complex and/or multi-
> stakeholder environments.
Previous intent: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20130910/#sc_b315

<Greg> facilitate and encourage however we are not an enforcement body, these are guidelines, others with authority may choose to make them rules
JR: Reads it.

Greg: "facilitate and encourage"

JS: I like it

JT: Acknowledges thoughtful input

JR: Any objections to making that change to the implementations and to sending this rationale.

All: No

Resolution: All agree to the response and change in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JulSep/0071.html with two edits "facilitate"->"facilitate and encourage" AND remove duplicate "repair tools"

JT: We will keep eye out for additional comments.
... If no additional substantive comments received, timeline?

JS: I hope it can happen in 2 weeks...but I will need to attend a Directors meeting with Judy.... need to show that we've met various requirements
... I have a doc that is largely ready.
... Once it passes Directors meeting, we can publish
... But there may be changes we need to make
... e.g. they will be spot-checking comment responses etc.

JT: Great
... Good to hear when that meeting will happen, keep us up to date
... Any other people have questions?

All: None

3. Implementation report update (Jan)

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html

JR: Heard from AC about Part A for Defacto, Part B is coming soon

JS: This weekend I was talking to one of TB's colleagues about Lotus Connections....

TB: Basically this tool will have the same process as the MCE, we will need to get approval etc.
... It's very accessible but it's complex

JS: This person was suggesting we only look at the wiki part
... Thought it could be considered in isolation

TB: OK that seems managable
... Thought it was considered and dismissed int he past?

JR: Yes, because it was thought too complex...if the wiki can be looked at separately then maybe it becomes viable

JT: Maybe softwares are complex so it may be common for us to explain that we are looking at a part of something

JS: Strategically good to have large companies products moving towards ATAG2 conformance

TB: Do you need approvals if it is a public product

JS: No, but 6-8 months down the road, we will be looking for testimonials.

JR: So that's what I know about...

JT; There is also Google CourseBuilder

JT: The contact would like a walkthrough

JR: I can do that

JT: I qwill send JR the contact

JS: You should suggest they look at "ATAG at a glance" document

JT: Another one...OPS internal ... Test harness...evaluation tool.
... Framework does have a lot of Authoring Tool features

JR: OK, please send me the contacts

4. Other issues?

All: None heard

JT: OK we will keep an eye out for comments...
... Next meeting Oct 7


From: Richards, Jan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: September-27-13 5:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: AUWG Teleconference for 30 September


There will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 30 September 2013 at 1:00

pm- 2:00 pm ET:

Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#

Zakim: +1.617.761.6200       (Boston)

IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au



If people think they will arrive more than 15 minutes late, please send

me an email beforehand.



Most Recent Editors Drafts

=====================

ATAG 2.0

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ATAG20/



Implementing ATAG 2.0

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20/



Test Resources:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2-10April2012PublicWD-Tests



Implementation Report:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html



Agenda

======



1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)



2. CR process update (Jeanne and Jan) - we are in Last Call until October 1.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2013JulSep/0102.html

- Jan's proposed response to first comment received:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JulSep/0071.html



3. Implementation report update (Jan)

- Please send in your additions/edits in the following format:

  SC#-Level-Product-Status

E.g. A.1.1.1-LevelA-Drupal-Yes



4. Other issues?



--


(MR) JAN RICHARDS
PROJECT MANAGER
INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
OCAD UNIVERSITY

T 416 977 6000 x3957
F 416 977 9844
E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.