RE: ATAG 2.0 testing progress

Hi Tim,

We're certainly trying to, while also trying to make decent progress.

Will you be joining today?

-Jan


(MR) JAN RICHARDS
PROJECT MANAGER
INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
OCAD UNIVERSITY

T 416 977 6000 x3957
F 416 977 9844
E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=Re%3A%20AUWG%20Teleconference%20for%2017%20March%202014%20%28Boston%20time%20has%20changed%20-%20%20please%20re-check%20time%29&In-Reply-To=%3C0B1EB1C972BCB740B522ACBCD5F48DEB012E4B50AC%40ocadmail-maildb.ocad.ca%3E&References=%3C0B1EB1C972BCB740B522ACBCD5F48DEB012E4B50AC%40ocadmail-maildb.ocad.ca%3E>

________________________________
From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [[email protected]]
Sent: October-31-14 9:35 AM
To: Richards, Jan; WAI-AUWG List
Subject: RE: ATAG 2.0 testing progress

Thanks – interesting discussion yesterday – I hope that in addition to just checking pass/fail, the rationale for that was documented in the test harness, as well as what was actually done to test, and the test environment (OS/platform, etc.) – these are all important, and maybe should be documented in “additional comments” field  in test harness..  Thx Tim

From: Richards, Jan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 2:38 AM
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: ATAG 2.0 testing progress




Hi all

We had some good testing progress on Thursday (TinyMCE and CKEditor are finished). On Friday we plan to move on to Defacto in the morning and then Desire2Learn. From 1-2pm we'll be visiting the digital publishing interest group.

Cheers
Jan


Sent from my mobile.