RE: Call for ATAG WG Consensus: Moving ATAG 2.0 to Proposed Recommendation Status

I agree to moving ATAG 2.0 along to the next step (Proposed Recommendation =
Status).=0A=
=0A=
Cheers,=0A=
Jan=0A=
=0A=
(MR) JAN RICHARDS=0A=
PROJECT MANAGER=0A=
INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)=0A=
OCAD UNIVERSITY=0A=
=0A=
T 416 977 6000 x3957=0A=
F 416 977 9844=0A=
E [email protected]=0A=
=0A=
________________________________________=0A=
From: Treviranus, Jutta (Academic) [[email protected]]=0A=
Sent: June-29-15 4:20 PM=0A=
To: AUWG=0A=
Subject: Call for ATAG WG Consensus: Moving ATAG 2.0 to Proposed  Recommend=
ation Status=0A=
=0A=
Dear ATAG WG Members:=0A=
=0A=
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to move ATAG 2.0 to Proposed Recommendat=
ion status on the basis that the ATAG 2.0 Implementation Report has demonst=
rated sufficient authoring tool implementation to meet the exit criteria:=
=0A=
=0A=
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-ATAG20-20150604/#exit=0A=
=0A=
The CfC is now open via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, thou=
gh messages of support are welcome.=0A=
=0A=
If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this pro=
posal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later than 23:=
59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Sunday 5 July 2015.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks=0A=
Jutta Treviranus=0A=
AUWG Chair=0A=
=0A=