Re: XML problems with annotation bodies: client/server
"Eric Prud'hommeaux" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.annotation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:05:29PM +0100, Jose Kahan wrote: > > We were posting annotation bodies without the xml namespace attribute. > This bug was introduced in Amaya around December. > > I fixed the bug in Amaya and commited the change. > > I checked and I'm sending the body with the namespace. However, > when I load the annotation from the server, the server has eaten > the namespace attribute. > > Eric, could you take a look at this bug? yes. This is interesting. I think I need to store the namespace decls of all namespaces referenced in a parseType="Literal". These should be stored with the String object in the database. Furthur, I guess I should apply them to each root of the parsed literal on output. > Eric, a second request. All the annotations that were posted with > Amaya 7.x clients have this problem. Already we got a complain from > Dave Matthews (Annozilla) that the namespace is missing. > > Could it be possible to add the missing namespace to all XHTML > annotation bodies that were posted with Amaya since last december on > annotest.w3.org? I think that will have to happen. > Ralph, maybe you have a second opinion about that change. I'm all ears. -- -eric ([email protected])