Re: Annotea's context property

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mercoledì, 5 Mar 2003, alle 21:01 Europe/Paris, Brent Hendricks ha 
scritto:
> For my future reference, how do you determine whether something is a 
> resource or a literal from the schema?
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns defines 'context' (a literal) 
> and 'annotates' (a resource), as:
>
> <rdf:Property 
> rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#context">
>   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">context</rdfs:label>
>   <rdfs:comment>The context within the resource named in 'annotates' 
> to which the Annotation most directly applies.</rdfs:comment>
>   <rdfs:isDefinedBy 
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#"/>
> </rdf:Property>
>
> <rdf:Property 
> rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#annotates">
>   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">annotates</rdfs:label>
>   <rdfs:comment>Relates an Annotation to the resource to which the 
> Annotation applies.  The inverse relation is 
> 'hasAnnotation'</rdfs:comment>
>   <rdfs:isDefinedBy 
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#"/>
> </rdf:Property>
>
> To me these look pretty much the same.  Am I missing something?
The one with  "<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Literal"/>" is a literal ;-)

I'm wondering, why does zAnnot care about, isn't it a good idea for a 
server to return what it gets. Does zAnnot allow the author attribute 
to be both a Resource (VCARD or so) as well as a Literal, or does 
zAnnot insist on getting what it expects?

reto

PS: is there a public zAnnot server against which I can test my client?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE+ZwSoD1pReGFYfq4RAu0NAKCaWLEoa8eG+aMtBfA/CrvNZLRadACfa3Vd
aO2bmq/aOSOEVWJoFpf3o5g=
=yD0h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----