Re: Blank Node Identifier not supported by annotea

At 05:15 PM 4/28/2003 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:

>* Marja-Riitta Koivunen <[email protected]> [2003-04-28 17:02-0400]
> > Sorry for late answer:
> >
> > Annotea does not support blank node identifiers as RDF/XML Syntax
> > Specification
> > 
> (<http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-blank-nodes>http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-blank-nodes) 
>
> > is not a W3C Recommendation yet.
>
>Are you suggesting that people not implement the RDF Core specs until
>they get to REC? :(

Not suggesting anything, we just have a very limited amount of resources 
and need to select what we do. Something that already is a spec. we have 
less choice than something that isn't. But as you know English is my second 
language and reading between the lines is hard anyway.

>"We were too busy doing other stuff to get to it yet, give us a while!", by
>contrast, would have been a fine response...

And that's what I was trying to say as we are examining it right now and I 
did tell that. But cannot promise anything until we know a bit more of what 
is needed.

> >
> > Eric Prud'hommeaux is currently examining what would be needed and how 
> much
> > work it would be to do the changes.

Marja