Re: [seweb-list] Re: A discussion: Is semantic web an old fashioned idea? Is it bubble, unworthy or an interesting research area - Post your comments
Jon Hanna <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Jun 2004 03:22:04 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdf,gmane.org.w3c.annotation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting "John F. Sowa" <[email protected]>: > Every compiler has to maintain a symbol table to support those > features, and XSLT does not support symbol tables. I'm pretty sure you could fake it. I'm pretty sure you'd drive yourself insane though. > The 1959 language called LISP was the most successful platform > for supporting new languages that anyone has ever invented. > Lex and YACC only support syntax, but LISP has been used to > implement any semantics anyone could imagine. It is sad that > the W3C did not adopt LISP or at least something with equivalent > power for supporting language design. I think LISP inspired the way collections are represented in RDF. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> " it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt