Re: New annotea server in Zope

Nathan Young <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.annotation
Organization N.C. Young Design
Message-ID <USB8KENMBA82VSJD96QMDPMTQ4WNKXR.3da5ac6e@inky>
Hi.

>> We have tested it with Amaya and a forthcoming release of Annozilla. We
>>   have tried to to make ZAnnot compatible with the Annotea protocol
>> document as posted...

Is there any documentation about what clients need to be able to expect from 
servers (as a minimum)?  Or should each server completely implement the 
annotea protocol?

Also, is there anything that explains the annotation structure in more detail 
than 

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#

In particular, I'm not fully sure how I should handle: 

<r:Description about="URI">

I think this is because I'm stil learning about RDF.  From doing a bit of 
reading, my guess is that the URI given should return the full annotation 
again?

Also, is there a reason to use one of the body formats over another in a 
given situation? are they completely interchangable?  Specifically, would 
providing the body inline in the response to a query save the client an extra 
request?

<a:body r:resource="http://www.example.com/mycomment.html"/>

<a:body>
  ...
</a:body>

Thanks in advance!

---->Nathan


---
(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*
(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*
---



Nathan Young
N. C. Young Design
(530)629-4176
http://ncyoung.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.