Confusion over RDF for annotation type

Matthew Wilson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.annotation
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
In this message:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-annotation/2002JulDec/0000.html

it seemed that there was confusion over the correct way to indicate the 
type of an annotation.

Jim Ley thought that annotations should have an rdf:type of a:Annotation 
and could optionally have an a:annotationType which described the 
annotation type in more detail.

But the protocol page indicates that there can be two different rdf:type's.

Can anyone clarify this?

Matthew Wilson
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.