Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Bert Bos <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:56:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.specifications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2071648.2zatYq8UMd@hexa> |
These comments are very good, but to me they also show that we should not try to hard-code the (G)UI in the document, because as many people will hate it as like it. I think the task of the authors, and of W3C as the publisher, is to make sure the documents are rich and consistent enough that all the different ways of navigating and interacting are possible. As long as we get the contents and some basic typography right, the reader can choose for himself which UA he wants to use and how he wants to configure it. That, after all, is the great thing about HTML: authors can concentrate on the contents without having to worry about the look and feel, and readers can consume that content with a device and software of their choosing. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM [email protected] 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 163 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEABECAAYFAlY7bgkACgkQLXrkIBhLW6SPtwCeMtN8SOJOKabQwHh6f9PO1ATF Y7YAoK7qH+tUErgip+aaRQ3QthQVpqd8 =YM0t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----