Re: DIagrams and PlantUML
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:40:14 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.specifications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOk_reE7VHBWqW0jBXWLfBBOeg=y814g4un=EhB-KB-yxdaxRw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Jan 27, 2016 10:53 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On January 28, 2016 at 3:37:26 PM, Shane McCarron ([email protected]) > wrote: > > So, here are the options as I see them: > > 4. Tell people to generate static versions by hand and commit them into > > the repo. > > This. Relying on a third party to do the conversion as a service from some > proprietary format seems tremendously wasteful, insecure, etc. (all the > things you mentioned). > > > What do others think? Is there a more sensible way to approach this > > problem? > > It's extremely rare that once a diagram is done, it will be updated very > often... maybe one updates a diagram 10-20 times max during the whole life > of a standards project (~5 years). So I would personally throw this into > the "would be nice... someday after we finish the actual spec" pile. > > Yeah... I am inclined to not put too much effort into automating it. I do have a node.js script that can generate an svg from source (via the proxy service) that I suppose I could put in the repo so other editors can use it or something. Just as a tool to ease the generation of the "static" diagrams. Any other opinions out there?