Re: ReSpec updated

There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding 
"It is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that 
pubrules rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is accepted 
by pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but there may be 
others. The output of the new respec needs checking against pubrules 
before it can be considered fixed. Michael

On 10/03/2016 1:36 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Okay - we have a stable ReSpec pushed that supports the new 
> stylesheets etc. by default, and has a number of other changes.  Sorry 
> for the delay.  Thanks to Marcos for all his late nights and hard work 
> to get this stable again!
>
> -- 
> -Shane