Re: ReSpec: Intent to depracate XHTML 1.0 save support
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> Tue, 31 May 2016 21:54:04 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.specifications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAci2aAQBs9xFfCs7JuAv+dHJh63ibHgdVyQyNUkzTshk1xZWQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On June 1, 2016 at 2:17:56 AM, Michiel Bijl ([email protected]) wrote: > > On 16 May 2016, at 14:55, Shane McCarron wrote: > > > > It has an XHTML 1 version. > > But it has another version? Would it be feasible to forward the xhtml 1 version to some > other version? My (terribly limited) understanding is that RDFa is tied to xhtml 1 instead of xhtml 5, because there is no modern schema that one can validate xhtml+rdfa against. Otherwise, it would be possible to publish xhtml5+rdfa documents. Shane, is that correct?