RE: ReSpec and how it gets used

--001a113cd0241719aa05348886f6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Can you send a link to the document?  We can do some testing.
On Jun 5, 2016 7:15 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Friday, June 3, 2016 3:19 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> > It means that the gh-pages branch is raw respec source, not static
> > saved output of respec.  Examples?  Sure.  http://w3c.github.io
> > /webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/ for example.  Basically everyone who
> > uses respec at w3c EXCEPT ARIA / APA.  As far as I know.
>
> We, the Hydra W3C Community Group also have dynamic Respec documents.
> Recently I more often got reports that those documents don't render
> properly for some users. The last one I heard was that a fully patched IE11
> can't render them.. I haven't verified that yet though.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>

--001a113cd0241719aa05348886f6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Can you send a link to the document?=C2=A0 We can do some te=
sting. </p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 5, 2016 7:15 AM, &quot;Markus Lanthaler&q=
uot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]=
et</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
 style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On=
 Friday, June 3, 2016 3:19 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:<br>
&gt; It means that the gh-pages branch is raw respec source, not static<br>
&gt; saved output of respec.=C2=A0 Examples?=C2=A0 Sure.=C2=A0 <a href=3D"h=
ttp://w3c.github.io" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://w3c.github=
.io</a><br>
&gt; /webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/ for example.=C2=A0 Basically everyone =
who<br>
&gt; uses respec at w3c EXCEPT ARIA / APA.=C2=A0 As far as I know.<br>
<br>
We, the Hydra W3C Community Group also have dynamic Respec documents.<br>
Recently I more often got reports that those documents don&#39;t render pro=
perly for some users. The last one I heard was that a fully patched IE11 ca=
n&#39;t render them.. I haven&#39;t verified that yet though.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Markus<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Markus Lanthaler<br>
@markuslanthaler<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--001a113cd0241719aa05348886f6--