Re: Relaxing mailing list requirement
Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:06:52 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.specifications |
|---|---|
| Organization | Aoyama Gakuin University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2016/08/19 15:30, Marcos Caceres wrote: > As a community, we've increasingly shifted away from gathering > spec-related feedback via mailing lists. Unfortunately, PubRules still > requires us to include a link to a mailing list in the boilerplate of > a spec. > > I'm wondering if we could relax the mailing list requirement? Instead, > make it optional to gather feedback either through a mailing list or > an issue tracker (e.g., Github issues). There are people (not me) who object to the use of sites such as github because it forces them to use non-free JavaScript. Also, there are people (including me) who find github highly suboptimal for issue tracking, because e.g. mail notifications contain virtually no context. Regards, Martin.