Re: Relaxing mailing list requirement
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:59:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.specifications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAwChxMm6Z0a0EH3MHcg7Rv9RCGevm=A7jAon3DCreUyLs=F4A@mail.gmail.com> |
On August 20, 2016 at 4:43:00 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. ([email protected]) wrote: > The email archive link is intentional and should be preserved. While > I love using GitHub as our issue tracker, it's not appropriate to rely > on GitHub the company as our history-maintainer. Agree. I was not suggesting otherwise. > Setting up a mailing > list that receives all GH Issues mail (or just repurposing the groups > main list for that purpose) is easy. Yep, is what we do. > For actual collab, tho, Specberus allows either a mailing list *or* a > GH Issues link, as you note. Yeah, I think I need to just update ReSpec's templates to allow developers to say "we prefer feedback on GitHub... historical archive of issues is captured in mailing list X".