Re: Retiring tr.rdf

There were RDF descriptions and now you are making them *less*
machine-readable by replacing them with a plain JSON API? Got it...

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:17 AM Denis Ah-Kang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the past, the only way to get data related to the
> specifications was tr.rdf [1]. However, a few years ago,
> we released the W3C API [2] to provide more complete data.
> Since we are now focusing our effort to improve the API,
> I would like to know who still rely on tr.rdf and what
> can we do to remove that dependency in favor of the API.
>
> I have already identified specref [3] and transition-notifier
> [4] in the list of tools using tr.rdf but if you know another
> one, please reach to me and I'll get in touch with the
> maintainers to see if there's a way to make the switch.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Denis
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr.rdf
> [2] https://api.w3.org/doc
> [3] https://github.com/tobie/specref
> [4] https://github.com/plehegar/transition-notifier
>