Re: "Packing on the Web" -- performance use cases / implications
Ilya Grigorik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.webperf,gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADXXVKr2NkoQAwzmYwUKqJVHM1vZm_7SoUg1x6pw+Uq55HbXXQ@mail.gmail.com> |
For anyone interested in following along: https://github.com/w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web/issues/23 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Nottingham, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 7:54 am, Ilya Grigorik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Martin Thomson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I'm talking about the use cases that .zip files satisfy, not that. I > > don't know why separating these is a problem. > > > > Looking at the cited use cases in [1]... 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 do not need > bundling and are *much* better handled by the UA fetching granular > resources based on the description in the package/manifest. In fact, even > for 2.4 it's not strictly necessary: the package contents can be downloaded > into a folder without forcing bundling within the package request. I think > we need to revisit the use cases and clarify their intent... > > +1. > > > -- > Mark Nottingham [email protected] https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > >