Re: Considering the pressure to turn HTTPS into a three-party protocol

Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.tag
Message-ID <CACvaWvavAMxgEAWVVjXZQBLP7rmAw9DNJ-PXdkmYDMTF+oc=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mark,

I had a lot more written, but realized it's best to keep things short
and simple:

a) No, not in scope
b) Important, in an abstract sense, but not in the www-tag as a specific item
c) Absolutely not

As a browser security person, particularly one who has been involved
in certificate pinning and transparency, I would just add that the
reason for not adding such controls is not about fear of losing users.
It's about remembering the classic immutable laws of security. In
particular, Rule #2 applies [1].

There's a lot more I can say on this - as you know from our
discussions in person on this topic, our emails, and our Tweets - but
I suspect it would do better just to make it clear that I don't think
it'd be a productive endeavor for the TAG to engage in, and just move
on.

[1] https://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc722487.aspx#EJAA
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.