Re: Considering the pressure to turn HTTPS into a three-party protocol
Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACvaWvavAMxgEAWVVjXZQBLP7rmAw9DNJ-PXdkmYDMTF+oc=nQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Mark, I had a lot more written, but realized it's best to keep things short and simple: a) No, not in scope b) Important, in an abstract sense, but not in the www-tag as a specific item c) Absolutely not As a browser security person, particularly one who has been involved in certificate pinning and transparency, I would just add that the reason for not adding such controls is not about fear of losing users. It's about remembering the classic immutable laws of security. In particular, Rule #2 applies [1]. There's a lot more I can say on this - as you know from our discussions in person on this topic, our emails, and our Tweets - but I suspect it would do better just to make it clear that I don't think it'd be a productive endeavor for the TAG to engage in, and just move on. [1] https://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc722487.aspx#EJAA