Re: discussion about uri scheme, fragments, etc...
Mark Nottingham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Possibly the most notable change is the loosening of rules on registration of provisional (not permanent) URI schemes; it's intentionally a VERY low bar. Cheers, > On 10 Apr 2015, at 5:38 pm, Yves Lafon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > This is a heads-up about discussions in IETF’s apps-group about draft-jetf-appswg-uri-scheme-reg. > See <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/FgWB_pukisUKJT2j89Fs_L588YA> and other email in that thread > for those interested (as we discussed fragments in the past here). > Of course, it’s best to send feedback on the IETF list. > HTH, > > -- > Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. > > ~~Yves > > > > > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/