Re: FYI: TAG review now part of Blink Intent-to-Ship guidelines
Daniel Appelquist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Alex - could you rough something up like this and we could take a look at it at the f2f next week? Possible to have the result of the form submission also open an issue in Github? Thanks, Dan > On 14 Apr 2015, at 01:09, Alex Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's...not particularly inviting? > > Was thinking maybe a google form where folks could be guided through outlining the major bits we'd want to know as we begin a review. Reviews-on-rails, as it were. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Mark Nottingham <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On 14 Apr 2015, at 3:50 am, Alex Russell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > Wanted to let you know that TAG review is now part of the discussion about shipping features in blink. The template for the proposals has been updated accordingly. > > > > Expect more folks reaching out to us. > > > > Could we have a simpler "ask for TAG review" form somewhere? > > <https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/new <https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/new>> doesn't do the trick? > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ <https://www.mnot.net/> > >
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 455 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVLNbuAAoJEKrgifdQB5UF5skH/iyTzsU17B4Y8714Dqu4tquL ciVImldETdRrn1Otit+4YYK2iIT1kNypSLkwwzzmEFLWO5b/9kpGif+TJlB21jDe 9eE+oRgl1QfYHNZHgfng6wbjZqYiARdPFWZwAiJ3K/Zyd4NYm/1OuE+aLoHWqv6T sKPmjZY21geohbzgNDeq3AVuYXG/93FT4RSLd7E37CMEOQVmjSPnBgHJTOOhKPpf Y0PYpA30uvvaZzR00D2RgclRxOrrXraS2rCe2zTgv9LeeksLhP8AlXKf/yZWITtJ OE0MyKVGJuBodrxhVIAIYjvCa+supVFfwkMs5qSx7FqSXHudVPtRWIV3sWKZFEc= =xL/y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----