Re: Use of .well-known for CSV metadata: More harm than good
David Booth <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:26:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/22/2015 06:19 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Just a minor fact: > >> On 22 Jun 2015, at 05:08 , Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: >> > <snip> > >> You can specify a heuristic for the 404 to be interpreted on the >> *client* side; it tells consumers that if there's a 404 without >> freshness information, they can assume a specified default. > > The CSVW mechanism planned for the .well-known case includes this. If > the .well-known file is not available, there is a default defined in > the spec (which leads to CSV metadata files residing in the same > directory as the original CSV file). I think Mark was talking about specifying a default *caching* behavior for the client to assume, if there's a 404 without freshness information. CSVW does not specify any default *caching* behavior for a 404. David Booth