Re: Request for a TAG review of the Presentation API
Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:49:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnb78iHvY3QMO_ykNK+xAX7JoycHYM+xdmzw2YECJANJ0LR3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:46 AM, mark a. foltz <[email protected]> wrote: > I think if we wanted to leverage this work, we would have to write the spec > in a way that applied it across the various combinations of raw > TCP/WebSockets/RTCDataChannel and TLS/DTLS that might be used to establish > the communication channel. At the end of the day I don't know it's the job > of the Presentation API specification to mandate network level protocols at > that level though. It definitely needs to be defined. We can't define high-level APIs and leave all the underpinnings undefined. That results in a platform that is not interoperable. Given a Google TV and a Mozilla phone, I should be able to project from the latter on the former. A X phone should be able to project too, provided X implemented the standard. "There be dragons" is not acceptable. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/