Re: removing keygen from HTML

Graham Leggett <[email protected]> Mon, 30 May 2016 18:36:23 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.tag
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 30 May 2016, at 4:14 PM, Harry Halpin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Some folks are using <keygen>, although I think everyone has been =
notified of the upcoming deprecation quite a while ago and so hopefully =
are preparing for a post-<keygen> world if they use client certs in the =
browser outside of TLS (such as for authentication). One deployment, MIT =
is working to moving to OpenID with Duo two-factor.=20
>=20
> It has been requested not to remove it until the replacement is ready, =
and I think WebAuthn fulfils the requirements in a way that is coherent =
with the Web Security Model.=20

I urge the working group to engage the crypto community and let the =
crypto community decide on what is or isn=E2=80=99t a replacement for =
keygen. No =E2=80=9Cproxy auth=E2=80=9D based system like OpenID is able =
to replace the capabilities of client certificates.

> Here's the WebAuthn schedule - so thus, one-factor cryptographic =
authentication should be working across most browsers later in the year, =
as early as October. So far, the Working Group has been moving very =
fast.=20

I would also urge the working group to treat any attempt at rushing this =
issue with a significant amount of skepticism.

Regards,
Graham
=E2=80=94