Re: WebAuthn API Specification Review
Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:17:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.internationalization.general,gmane.org.w3c.tag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnb78in3SM4oFZ1q_Bx7fL-MAfUUz-DBcJQfcAQ_NKrLG-t1A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]> wrote: > To clarify we are aiming for CR at the TPAC meeting. Based on a quick review (I submitted some feedback via GitHub), it doesn't quite seem editorially ready for that. It's also still unclear to me that we as a community embraced extending the reach of cookies (public suffix reach) to other APIs. Last I checked, e.g., exposing something as simple as an API for public suffix was still taboo. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/