Re: Vendor Extension Warnings

Yves Lafon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.validator.css
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jordan Clark wrote:

> To the CSS Validator team:
>
> What has happened to the new option that you recently added, which 
> allowed us to display vendor extensions as warnings (as opposed to 
> errors)?
>
> I really do hope that you have just taken it down temporarily, rather 
> than permanently removing the option.

In fact, it happened when a new translation was added and the translated 
indexes regenerated. It didn't disappear from the code but only from the 
main validator page, fixed now. Thank you for reporting it!
BR

> In my humble opinion, the possibility of being able to class CSS vendor 
> extensions as warnings is *A Good Thing*: Many ? myself included ? do 
> not want to use CSS properties that do not validate. As you probably 
> know, some websites, such as government organisations, are actually 
> *bound* use to valid code. Therefore, by removing this option, you are 
> effectively discouraging a large number of designers/developers from 
> pushing the boundaries and using the new features and functionality that 
> CSS3 provides.
>
> Just my two cents, as they say.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordan Clark
> http://profile.jdclark.org
>
> (P.S. If you *have* only took this feature down for some behind-the-scenes fine-tuning, please accept my apology for this little rant!)
>
>

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.