FW: REV attribute on A and LINK elements

Mark Rogers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.validator
Message-ID <1F68EA0E0CBFBE44A9A64274E1AC01A1218F4C4AAC@DFW1MBX23.mex07a.mlsrvr.com>
I believe the validator used to flag using the REV attribute on A and LINK elements as obsolete, but no longer does this. The REV attribute is still marked as non-conforming in the HTML5  CR and nightly specs. The language looks the same in all the versions:

"11.2 Non-conforming features"
"The following attributes are obsolete (though the elements are still part of the language), and must not be used by authors:
"rev on a elements"
"rev on link elements"

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/CR/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-html5-20140204/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features

Looking into this a bit deeper, I think there might be a mismatch between the HTML5 CR and the RFDa recommendation (which says "RDFa supports the use of @rel and @rev on any element.")
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdfa-core-20130822/#examples
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdfa-core-20130822/#A-rev

There are also 4 tests in the conformance checker test suite that use the REV attribute, with the naming indicating validators should not flag a conformance error:
html-rdfa/0006-isvalid.html
html-rdfa/0007-isvalid.html
html-rdfa/0009-isvalid.html
html-rdfa/0010-isvalid.html

So, what's the correct behaviour - is this conforming or non-conforming?

Best Regards
Mark

Mark Rogers - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
PowerMapper Software Ltd - www.powermapper.com<http://www.powermapper.com>
Registered in Scotland No 362274 Quartermile 2 Edinburgh EH3 9GL
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.