Re: High level of queries about validation, whatsapp and bb code.

> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:29:23 +0000
> From: David Dorward <[email protected]>
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
> 
> Over the last few months there has been a pattern of questions of the
> mailing list which boil down to "Here are some links mentioning
> whatsapp, I'm using BB Code, the HTML is invalid, what should I do?".
> 
> The pattern is looking rather spammy so I searched for the URLs on
> Google and found them turning up in queries to bug trackers and in
> comment spam.
> 
> Should they be filtered out of incoming email and purged from the
> list archives?

The W3C mailing-list system already uses a spam-filtering mechanism that
catches a huge amount of spam before it gets to W3C mailing lists. Right
now looking at the list-management UI, I see 1103 spam messages it's
blocked recently from reaching the list. So it's working well already.

Unfortunately that spam filter doesn't catch everything -- especially not
messages like the ones we've been seeing that appear to be crafted to look
similar to normal messages that we get on the list.

Anyway, even if we used a mechanism for augmenting that spam filter with
something additional for manually specifying single blacklist keywords
(which we don't), I think it'd be a losing battle because the spammers just
adjust by changing their words.

Certainly I can say in this case that simple blocking based on "whatsapp"
or "BBCode" wouldn't solve the problem on this list, because a number of
the spam/clickbait messages the got through didn't contain those words.

Anyway, we do at least have is a mechanism the W3C team can access to mark
copies of the messages as spam in the online archive for the list & remove
any links to them from elsewhere in the archive (e.g., index pages); ex:

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2015Jan/0012.html

I've done that for the clickbait messages that were sent to the list over
the last few weeks -

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2015Jan/thread.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2014Dec/thread.html

If you see any remaining there that I missed, let me know.

  --Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike/status

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=zhYY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----