Re: xslfo20 design notes feedback
Dave Pawson <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:51:24 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.xsl-editors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the reply Liam et al. 2010/1/14 Liam R E Quin <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Dave Pawson wrote: >> 2009-10-09T09:52:33Z >> Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/ >> Author: Dave Pawson. >> Comments to [email protected] >> 2.2.1.3 "distance" >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Perhaps better named as 'dimension', since that is how it i= s >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0described? Even when it is a percentage this makes more sen= se. > > We'll consider it; note that the property is not naming a dimension, > but is giving a distance between two points. >From my tech drawing days, the distance between two points was a dimension? >> 3.2.6 Spanning cell over all row and columns >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Zero as a value seems to be a case of seeing a bad = example and >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 following it? 'all' seems far more practical and in= tuitive. The >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 terminology for properties is becoming depressingly= obtuse. > > Thank you - we agree with you. =C2=A0Unfortunately, HTML already uses zer= o > for this purpose; for now, we have noted this as an open issue for > the next publication of our draft. As I said, see a bad example and follow it! Hope to see it changed in the next draft. > >> 3.4.1 fo:spread-page-master >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Very welcome! >> >> 3.5 Bleeds and Trim >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0More weak, old fashioned terminology? It may be accu= rate and >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0appropriate for a typographer and setter. Is it appr= opriate for >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0the user of this specification? IMHO - no. > > We do have requirements to support bleed and trim, coming from > people doing that old-fashioned paper stuff :-) =C2=A0The terms > are standard in the industry and very much in use today. =C2=A0Or > are we misunderstanding you? "The industry" and a W3C rec are not the same thing. I see no reason to assume every user of xsl-fo is an ex type-setter? At least give us a glossary of 'old fashioned' terms to something more modern? Even if it requires a graphic to explain it. >> 7. Images. >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ability to centre an image vertically on a page. Here or ea= rlier? >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0I.e. Leave a header and an image as an odd page decoration = or to >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0break some sort of page sequence > Wouldnt you do this in the page master? Just so long as I can do it... though generating a special page master just for such an odd page seems.... odd? > >> 7.4. Callouts >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0yes please! 'Ensure positioning, so I can label aunt= Izabel and >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0uncle Joe. > > Ah, 6.1.2. Yes, we don't have a good solution for this yet, beyond > an SVG overlay. x=3Dhorizontal offset from top-left of graphic y=3Dvert offset from top-left of graphic? docbook has a solution, where the co xml:id=3D'n' generates the location of the callout text. Unsure if this would meet your needs. > > Thank you for taking the time to view our draft! > > The XSL-FO Subgroup. Welcome, and good luck. regards --=20 Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk