Tables Don't Respect Reference Orientation--why?

"W. Eliot Kimber" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.xsl-editors
Organization ISOGEN International
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I notice that the spec says that only writing mode determines the cell 
and row progression order. I'm wondering why this is--I can't 
immediately think of any reason that tables shouldn't be rotatable just 
as any other reference area is--that is, the interaction of writing-mode 
with reference-orientation seems no more complex in a table context than 
in a multi-column page context, for example.

Have I missed some hidden complexity?

Thanks,

Eliot
-- 
W. Eliot Kimber, [email protected]
Consultant, ISOGEN International

1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.