XSL 1.0 - Section 2.2 XSL Namespace
"G. Ken Holman" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.xsl-editors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5.1.0.14.0.20021115072042.031d0d80@junk> |
Dear XSL Editors, Section 2.2 of XSL 1.0 states "Implementors must not extend the XSL namespace with additional elements or attributes. Instead, any extension must be in a separate namespace." It is unclear if extensions are allowed to be in "no namespace", i.e. using an unprefixed element type name with no default namespace in scope. Such elements are distinguished from XSL elements, but are not in a specific namespace as might be implied by the second sentence of the quote. Therefore, is it an error for an XSL document to have any elements in no namespace, or is such an element merely considered to be an extension? Thank you! .................. Ken -- Upcoming hands-on in-depth XSLT/XPath and/or XSL-FO: - North America: Feb 3 - Feb 7,2003 G. Ken Holman mailto:[email protected] Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath ISBN 0-13-140374-5 Definitive XSL-FO ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN 1-894049-10-1 Practical Formatting Using XSL-FO Next conference training: 2002-12-08,03-03,06