Regarding your comment on xsl-editors
Paul Grosso <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.xsl-editors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your comment to [email protected] archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002JanMar/0145 The XSL WG is going through the comments at this time, developing errata and lists of items to consider for a future version of XSL. The following is our disposition of your above comment: --- Disposition: Accepted (bug in spec) Yes the example is wrong. Erratum, Section 6.6.1.1.2: Replace: in XSL stylesheet: <fo:external-graphic src="{@image}"/> with <fo:external-graphic src="'url({@image})'"/> Replace: fo: element and attribute tree: <fo:external-graphic src="TH0317A.jpg"/> with <fo:external-graphic src="'url(TH0317A.jpg)'"/> >Should I be telling my students it is mandatory? Disposition: Explanation of XSL spec Yes! --- Please Reply (cc-ing [email protected]) if you wish to make an objection to our resolution. Thank you for your interest in XSL. Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG