Two content model concerns for 1.1 WD

Editors,

I had two content model concerns that may have been
miscategorized as editorial in nature.  I have not
seen any correction in the latest WD, and want to make
sure that indeed the new CM's are what is actually
desired for 1.1.

1.) (#62 of my previous comment list)  The CM for
fo:simple-page-master changed from 1.0 to 1.1 to allow
for multiple fo:region-bodies:

1.0 --
(region-body,region-before?,region-after?,region-start?,region-end?)

1.1 --
(region-body+,region-before?,region-after?,region-start?,region-end?)

I'm not seeing what multiple fo:region-bodies for an
fo:s-p-m are providing in 1.1, or why the SG moved to
this for the new model.  Is it related to the new
fo:flow-maps?  I would appreciate "enlightenment" from
anyone here--not necessarily the SG--as I'm quite
curious as to the purpose of multiple fo:region-bodies
in 1.1!


2.) (#74 of my previous comment list)  In accomodating
the new fo:flow-map within the fo:layout-master-set,
it appears that the new CM is inadvertently now making
simple-page-masters/page-sequence-masters optional.  I
don't think that this was the intention of the SG, and
so I would like the editors to check this again:

1.0 -- (simple-page-master|page-sequence-master)+

1.1 --
(simple-page-master|page-sequence-master|flow-map)+

i.e., it is no longer necessary for an fo:l-m-s to
have an fo:s-p-m or a fo:p-s-m--one fo:flow-map will
suffice.  

If this was not the intention, it appears switching
the 1.1 CM to something like

((simple-page-master|page-sequence-master)+,(flow-map)*)

or, adding a prose statement after the CM declaring it
an error for a fo:layout-master-set not to have at
least one fo:s-p-m or fo:p-s-m would clarify this
issue.

Many thanks!
Glen



		
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com