xsl 1.1 naming

A comment came up on the xslt list which you may wish to consider.

> Just a minor point: there will never be an XSLT 1.1. Work on XSL-FO 1.1
> is well under way: http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/

yes I thought of that too when the message came back, didn't think of it
while writing. I think actually given the history of xslt 1.1 it's
rather unfortunate that teh XSL wg have numbered XSL revision 1.1rather
than 1.2 or 2 or something else, given that it still claims more or less
that xslt and xsl-fo are "part" of xsl.

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk