Re: Credible sources
Andy Mabbett via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABiXOE=18yd7qpo2ByuqTYEe1o7JGL5EdbDkwmYFMwEEcdtX6w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 08:58, Gerard Meijssen via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]> wrote: > In the past several British papers were no longer considered credible sources. Given the dominiation of USAmerican publications by a USAmerican government that is known for distorting the truth about everything, it is relevant to consider the extent we trust American sources. We won't deprecate American sources simply because they are American, in the same way that we do not deprecate British sources simply because they are British. We already deprecate individual American sources where they are shown to be unreliable, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_261#RfC:_National_Enquirer You—or anyone else—are welcome to raise a similar RfC if you find an American—or any—source which is unsuitable. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/GKMJU7PYOU5PJXLJ2INZF5ELINAHFBRW/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]