Re: GFDL / CC by-sa compatibility
Evan Prodromou <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal |
|---|---|
| Organization | Evan Prodromou |
| Message-ID | <871xqyaevm.fsf@unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> |
>>>>> "DM" == Daniel Mayer <maveric149-/[email protected]> writes: DM> Evan, you listening? I remember pointing this out soon after DM> Wikitravel started and you said you were going to contact the DM> CC people about that. DM> http://www.wikitravel.org/article/Wikitravel:Copyleft You've pointed out a serious weakness in the CC licenses. The next version of the CC licenses, apparently, are going to have "or any later version" in them. (Also, the copyleft ones will be compatible with the GFDL, apparently. Like, you can take by-sa content and put it into GFDL content, if not vice versa.) DM> One problem with the current CC by-sa is that there is no "or DM> later version" clause in by-sa 1.0. So I don't know how a DM> project like Wikitravel could even upgrade to the new version DM> of the by-sa without having to get the permission of every one DM> of their contributors (past, present and future). Thanks for bringing up a king-sized bummer for me, Mav. B-) Yeah, we're aware of this, and trying to work out a strategy so we can upgrade to the new licenses when they come around. ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou <[email protected]> Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/ The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide