Re: Use of Wikipedia content off the web

Andy Rabagliati <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.wikimedia.legal
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004, Thomas R. Koll wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Andy Rabagliati wrote:
> > 
> >   Another delivery option is physical carriage of the same UUCP data
> >   using a USB memory stick. This allows schools without telephone
> >   infrastructure to access web and email.
> 
> Must be a 256MB stick...
> 

Actually, I use 128M - which carries quite a lot of mail and web content.

> >   Any serious attempt to give them access seems to involve duplication
> >   of the wikipedia database locally, and probably means that local
> >   edits will be ignored.
> 
> AFAIK no one is working on such a delayed merge-in, sadly.
> First MediaWikis edit-/diff-system needs an improvement.
> 
> >   Does anyone have any constructive suggestions for a solution ?
> > 
> >   I do not mind dropping down a whole computer on their network
> >   to handle wikipedia. However, I see the sticky issue as
> >   licensing wikimedia content offsite.
> 
> If you do a complete database mirror including the software
> you will have the very same thing like on the live Wikipedia.
> So there won't be any complains about such an solution.
> You can put your local installation into read-only mode.
> 
> Database dumps are only about weekly but that should be more than
> enough for you.
> Maybe we should do the dumps early Saturady so you can use the cheaper
> weekend for connecting and updating the database.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia mentions this database, but does not
provide a link to get this.

How big is it ?

Incrementals ?

We pay for everything. Data here is about 4c (US) per megabyte.

One shot download, with yearly updates ?

CDs ?

[ Sorry for posting back a private reply, but I think it was meant to go to the list ]

Cheers,  Andy!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.