Re: Public Library of Science GFDL Compatible
Andre Engels <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.misc,gmane.org.wikimedia.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Wouter Vanden Hove wrote: > I didn't see it mentioned anywhere, so I post it anyway. > > Last week the Public Library of Science (www.plos.org) launched their > first Open Acces Journal under the Creative Commons Attribution License > http://www.plosbiology.org > > This means (at least in theory) all of this can be reused in the > Wikipedia, including images. As far as I know, this is not true. Creative Commons only allows spreading under the same license, not with more or less rights. Since the GNU/FDL is not the same license, it is not allowed to go from CC to GNU/FDL - or vice versa. I'd love it if someone proved me wrong, and either showed that there is a loophole (intended or unintended) that can be used and/or could get the "those licenses require basically the same things but in different wording, so no harm is done by cross-licensing" argument into something that would be juridically valid. Andre Engels