Re: [Foundation-l] Project Proposal: GlobalFamilyTree

Joel Konkle-Parker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.wikimedia.legal
Message-ID <1085416061.40b2227d0dc9c__24439.9371011697$1085416274@webmail.msstate.edu>
Quoting Daniel Mayer <maveric149-/[email protected]>:
> I've already proposed that at http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimorial .
>
> The idea is to simply expand the focus of the the Sep11wiki (which is a
> rather
> lonely place).
>
> The only major stumbling block was the name - some people didn't like
> 'Wikimorial'. Other ideas were:
> *Wikimedia Memorial (generic and boring, IMO),
> *Wikipeople (I liked this one so I bought the domain names),
> *Wikifamily (another one I liked - although in the U.S. right-wing Christian
> fundamentalists have co-opted the word "family").

Well, I guess I missed that one. It sounds like our end goal is the same, but
for different reasons. Your description and name (Wikimorial) implies a
memorial/obituary/mourning project, more than a living global genealogy. But
perhaps this is not the case?

What I had in mind was a living genealogy reference, not so much memorializing
the past, but serving as a reference guide to those curious about their
ancestors. This goal wouldn't require a ban on content for the living, either
(I'd be interested in looking up my uncle and seeing "So-and-so is a consultant
for Whatchamathingy Inc.).

But I agree that these projects can be merged without too much lost. As for the
name, I like "Wikipeople", "GlobalFamilyTree", "Wikialogy"(?), "Ancestors"(?).


--
Joel Konkle-Parker
Webmaster  [Ballsome.com]

E-mail     [[email protected]]
Phone      [662-518-1636]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.