Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright issues of wikimedia projects
"Jean-Christophe Chazalette" <jean-christophe.chazalette-QFKgK+z4sOrR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal,gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <003701c44579$c88a6950$0100a8c0@jchristophe> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthere" <anthere9-/[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:05 PM Subject: [Foundation-l] Copyright issues of wikimedia projects > I guess this is my last attempt to talk about > copyright issues in this place before deciding that > > - copyright discussions are obviously not interesting > *anyone* here, so are not worth trying to be discussed > since it raises absolutely no interest whatsoever > > - or that are not to be discussed in any other place > than on the english wikipedia list (see Tomos > discussion about changing our copyright license, > discussion that is occuring in another place, with the > idea that all wikipedias would follow the english > rules afterwards) > > So, I'll ask just another time to be certain. > > I must say that I am currently very disappointed by > lack of cooperation on the matter, because I do not > think my question is very difficult for those working > in the wikimedia projects other than wikipedia. > > We are setting the foundation status. The current > status are indicating that ALL OF OUR CONTENTS > (wikimedia projects) will be distributed under the > gfdl license. It doesn't say that, ant : "WF have contents which are not protected by the provisions regulating the the intellectual property, if such is the case freely distributed under the conditions of a free licence of documentation of the type of the Free Documentation License written by Free Software Foundation Inc, and in particular its European branch with http://www.fsfeurope.org/" No classical copyright, and a possibility of *a* free licence *of the type* of GFDL. So that I can't see how it would be possibly wider. Did we read the same text ? :-) villy