Re: Re: Verbatim copying
Andre Engels <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Daniel Mayer wrote: > a GNU FDL Lite would be very nice. It would require (IMO): > 1) A mention of the source publisher (such as saying "text from Wikipedia" or > whatnot) > 2) A functional link back to the original document, or the full url in a > printed copy. NOTE this should always be to where most of the document was > created. > 3) A mention of that the text is under the GNU FDL-lite (link back on > Internet, full url to the GNU's version for printed copies) > 4) Any modifications and additions must be licensed under the GNU FDL. #2 is not something that is required by the 'heavy' GNU/FDL. Rather, it requires that the material must be made freely available in machine-readable form. If someone publishes Wikipedia material unchanged, such a link back would be a good way to fulfill this required, but if they change it, they will have to put their own version on the net, or distribute it with whatever else they are distributing. Andre Engels