[Foundation-l] Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: w to properly use articles from an outside GFDL source?

Daniel Mayer <maveric149-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.wikimedia.legal,gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Tomos at Wikipedia <[email protected]> wrote on WikiEN-l:
> Mav, you are right in that the effect is limited because we cannot 
> retroactively apply the second license to past edits. But if we consider the 
> effect, it seems it is still better to introduce it than not, and we would 
> do just as Electicology suggested:

Sorry, it is simply not possible to create a derivative dual licensed work from
a GFDL-only licensed article. Doing so would be a violation of the copyright of
everyone who submitted the GFDL-only text. Dual licensing would also make it
impossible to accept any new GFDL-only text. 

We are stuck with the GFDL as is until the FSF makes changes to that license.
Let's concentrate on improving the license we have - Jimmy has already stated
that the FSF and CC people are interested in this type of thing. 

-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.