[Foundation-l] Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: w to properly use articles from an outside GFDL source?
Daniel Mayer <maveric149-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal,gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Tomos at Wikipedia <[email protected]> wrote on WikiEN-l: > Mav, you are right in that the effect is limited because we cannot > retroactively apply the second license to past edits. But if we consider the > effect, it seems it is still better to introduce it than not, and we would > do just as Electicology suggested: Sorry, it is simply not possible to create a derivative dual licensed work from a GFDL-only licensed article. Doing so would be a violation of the copyright of everyone who submitted the GFDL-only text. Dual licensing would also make it impossible to accept any new GFDL-only text. We are stuck with the GFDL as is until the FSF makes changes to that license. Let's concentrate on improving the license we have - Jimmy has already stated that the FSF and CC people are interested in this type of thing. -- Daniel Mayer (aka mav) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/