Re: [Foundation-l] A question to all board candidates...
Anthere <anthere9-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal,gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Daniel Mayer <maveric149-/[email protected]> wrote: > --- Anthere <anthere9-/[email protected]> wrote: > >... > > Another point I can think of, is the relationship > > between a paying member in a local chapter and a > > paying member in the foundation. Should they > > participate twice ? Just mentionning as well, that > > should fees be established, they should take into > > account the png and financial level of each > country. > > 16 dollars is fine in many countries, it is not in > > many others. > > I really think that be a chapter member a person > would first have to be a > dues-paying Wikimedia member. We could have > membership dues start at $10 a year > - less than the cost of a cheap lunch for two. The > amount a chapter member has > to pay to a chapter is really up to the chapter. > > -- Daniel Mayer (aka mav) Dear Daniel, > $10 a year > - less than the cost of a cheap lunch for two. In Madagascar, 10 dollars is feeding a full family for several months. Set the amount of the annual fee at 10 dollars whatever the nationality of the member will ensure that the participation to Wikimedia information spreading *all over the world* is an activity limited to "rich members" living in developped countries members. Most french people from France could afford 10 dollars/euros a year. But I would be *embarassed* to request that amount to an Algerian student, and I would *blush in shame* to request that to a person in Madagascar. That goes for local chapter as well as Foundation. Our participation from third world countries is currently terribly low. Many of those people are among those who lack terribly of information. You and I, do not need *more* information really, we need perhaps better information, we need less biaised information, but not *more*. Actually, we have often too much information. And as for myself, I consider that the most important role Wikipedia in particular, could have, is to bring information to those who do not have access to it. In our countries, the information will very likely be distributed through the internet mostly. That is the best way to keep it updated. And that will be cheap. In less developped countries, the issue is not even daily updated information, it is just information in itself. And it is more relevant to think that part of the distribution will be paper or cd. Which means we need people to BE in the country of distribution probably. We need physical persons over there. These people will have to be members of the Foundation so as to participate a minimum to discussion and votes on these distribution projects. I would blush in shame to ask them 10 dollars to have the opportunity to help when 10 dollars is the average monthly revenue of a person in that country. Ihmo (but I am aware it is likely to be controversial); no participant willing to help *should* have to pay money to do so. People already give a lot of their time, energy and such. That is enough that they do not need to pay on top. We are such an organisation that I am sure we could make it without forcing people to pay to help. That is a very capitalist approach to do so. I am sure that people would just make donations naturally if they feel it can help. And last winter donation call support this. That is what is done in my kids school, which is catholics, and ask money to help. It is not mandatory; people are suggested to help, they are suggested a certain amount, if they give that amount, they perhaps receive 4 times a year a report paper, and that is it. People can give recommanded amount. People can give more. People can give nothing. They are still part of us. And that works quite well. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/