[Wikilegal-l] Re: Public Library of Science GFDL Compatible

"Tomos at Wikipedia" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.misc,gmane.org.wikimedia.legal
Message-ID <[email protected]>
If I am not mistaken, the important part of CC licenses is that they are not 
necessarily viral.

For example, CC-by (aka CC-Attribution license) allows the authors of 
derivative works to change the license terms, as I understand. If you modify 
the work, you should still make an attribution. But you do not have to 
license that derivative work you created under the same (CC-By) license. You 
can fully copyright it, or you can release it under GFDL.

CC-by-sa (CC-Attribution-Share Alike)  is a different story. That is viral 
and requires derivative works to be released under the same licenese. This, 
I think is clear when one compares two license terms, especially the part 
4-b.
And here are the links:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/legalcode

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/legalcode

Sorry if I am mistaken. But if I'm right, you can create some derivative 
work first, and you can release it under GFDL. I hope someone else can 
double check the legal code on this point.

regards,

Tomos

_________________________________________________________________
See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now 
FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.