[Wikilegal-l] Re: Public Library of Science GFDL Compatible
"Tomos at Wikipedia" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.misc,gmane.org.wikimedia.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If I am not mistaken, the important part of CC licenses is that they are not necessarily viral. For example, CC-by (aka CC-Attribution license) allows the authors of derivative works to change the license terms, as I understand. If you modify the work, you should still make an attribution. But you do not have to license that derivative work you created under the same (CC-By) license. You can fully copyright it, or you can release it under GFDL. CC-by-sa (CC-Attribution-Share Alike) is a different story. That is viral and requires derivative works to be released under the same licenese. This, I think is clear when one compares two license terms, especially the part 4-b. And here are the links: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/legalcode http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/legalcode Sorry if I am mistaken. But if I'm right, you can create some derivative work first, and you can release it under GFDL. I hope someone else can double check the legal code on this point. regards, Tomos _________________________________________________________________ See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com